My favourite/favorite bit: 'If, in the article you are presented with, the paper depends on a presupposition that is not demonstrated, you can dismiss the conclusions as motivated.'
I like this because it is historically evident. Remember the gay gene? And scientists were among the proponents of racist pseudoscience-measuring skulls to prove racial superiority
My favourite/favorite bit: 'If, in the article you are presented with, the paper depends on a presupposition that is not demonstrated, you can dismiss the conclusions as motivated.'
Incisive article - thank you.
I like this because it is historically evident. Remember the gay gene? And scientists were among the proponents of racist pseudoscience-measuring skulls to prove racial superiority